On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 09:42:13AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > We are mistakenly skipping transition watermarks on glk. Fix > up the condition for glk, and toss in the w/a name from > the database. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > index ed9786241307..5ce60faef28c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > @@ -4848,8 +4848,11 @@ static void skl_compute_transition_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate, > const u16 trans_amount = 10; /* This is configurable amount */ > u16 wm0_sel_res_b, trans_offset_b, res_blocks; > > - /* Transition WM are not recommended by HW team for GEN9 */ > - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 9) > + /* > + * WaDisableTWM:skl,kbl,cfl,bxt > + * Transition WM are not recommended by HW team for GEN9 > + */ > + if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) > return; > > /* Transition WM don't make any sense if ipc is disabled */ > -- > 2.19.2 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
