In order to avoid preempting ourselves, we currently refuse to schedule
the tasklet if we reschedule an inflight context. However, this glosses
over a few issues such as what happens after a CS completion event and
we then preempt the newly executing context with itself, or if something
else causes a tasklet_schedule triggering the same evaluation to
preempt the active context with itself.
However, when we avoid preempting ELSP[0], we still retain the preemption
value as it may match a second preemption request within the same time period
that we need to resolve after the next CS event. However, since we only
store the maximum preemption priority seen, it may not match the
subsequent event and so we should double check whether or not we
actually do need to trigger a preempt-to-idle by comparing the top
priorities from each queue. Later, this gives us a hook for finer
control over deciding whether the preempt-to-idle is justified.
The sequence of events where we end up preempting for no avail is:
1. Queue requests/contexts A, B
2. Priority boost A; no preemption as it is executing, but keep hint
3. After CS switch, B is less than hint, force preempt-to-idle
4. Resubmit B after idling
v2: We can simplify a bunch of tests based on the knowledge that PI will
ensure that earlier requests along the same context will have the highest
priority.
v3: Demonstrate the stale preemption hint with a selftest
References: a2bf92e8cc16 ("drm/i915/execlists: Avoid kicking priority on the current context")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 20 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c | 2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 96 ++++++++++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_lrc.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
index 4eeba588b996..2d172991024f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
@@ -238,6 +238,18 @@ sched_lock_engine(struct i915_sched_node *node, struct intel_engine_cs *locked)
return engine;
}
+static bool inflight(const struct i915_request *rq,
+ const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+ const struct i915_request *active;
+
+ if (!rq->global_seqno)
+ return false;
+
+ active = port_request(engine->execlists.port);
+ return active->hw_context == rq->hw_context;
+}
+
static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
{
@@ -327,6 +339,7 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dep->dfs_link);
engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline.lock);
/* Recheck after acquiring the engine->timeline.lock */
if (prio <= node->attr.priority || node_signaled(node))
@@ -355,17 +368,16 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
if (prio <= engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint)
continue;
+ engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;
+
/*
* If we are already the currently executing context, don't
* bother evaluating if we should preempt ourselves.
*/
- if (node_to_request(node)->global_seqno &&
- i915_seqno_passed(port_request(engine->execlists.port)->global_seqno,
- node_to_request(node)->global_seqno))
+ if (inflight(node_to_request(node), engine))
continue;
/* Defer (tasklet) submission until after all of our updates. */
- engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;
tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
index f12ecc8dec6b..8bc8aa54aa35 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -629,6 +629,8 @@ static void inject_preempt_context(struct work_struct *work)
EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
tasklet_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
}
+
+ (void)I915_SELFTEST_ONLY(engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count++);
}
/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index f7f2f53b4de4..dec4e1b04ae1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -188,13 +188,90 @@ static inline int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
return rq->sched.attr.priority;
}
+static int queue_prio(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
+{
+ struct i915_priolist *p;
+ struct rb_node *rb;
+
+ rb = rb_first_cached(&execlists->queue);
+ if (!rb)
+ return INT_MIN;
+
+ /*
+ * As the priolist[] are inverted, with the highest priority in [0],
+ * we have to flip the index value to become priority.
+ */
+ p = to_priolist(rb);
+ return ((p->priority + 1) << I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT) - ffs(p->used);
+}
+
static inline bool need_preempt(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
- const struct i915_request *last,
- int prio)
+ const struct i915_request *rq)
+{
+ const int last_prio = rq_prio(rq);
+
+ if (!intel_engine_has_preemption(engine))
+ return false;
+
+ if (i915_request_completed(rq))
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Check if the current priority hint merits a preemption attempt.
+ *
+ * We record the highest value priority we saw during rescheduling
+ * prior to this dequeue, therefore we know that if it is strictly
+ * less than the current tail of ESLP[0], we do not need to force
+ * a preempt-to-idle cycle.
+ *
+ * However, the priority hint is a mere hint that we may need to
+ * preempt. If that hint is stale or we may be trying to preempt
+ * ourselves, ignore the request.
+ */
+ if (!__execlists_need_preempt(engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint,
+ last_prio))
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Check against the first request in ELSP[1], it will, thanks to the
+ * power of PI, be the highest priority of that context.
+ */
+ if (!list_is_last(&rq->link, &engine->timeline.requests) &&
+ rq_prio(list_next_entry(rq, link)) > last_prio)
+ return true;
+
+ /*
+ * If the inflight context did not trigger the preemption, then maybe
+ * it was the set of queued requests? Pick the highest priority in
+ * the queue (the first active priolist) and see if it deserves to be
+ * running instead of ELSP[0].
+ *
+ * The highest priority request in the queue can not be either
+ * ELSP[0] or ELSP[1] as, thanks again to PI, if it was the same
+ * context, it's priority would not exceed ELSP[0] aka last_prio.
+ */
+ return queue_prio(&engine->execlists) > last_prio;
+}
+
+__maybe_unused static inline bool
+assert_priority_queue(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
+ const struct i915_request *prev,
+ const struct i915_request *next)
{
- return (intel_engine_has_preemption(engine) &&
- __execlists_need_preempt(prio, rq_prio(last)) &&
- !i915_request_completed(last));
+ if (!prev)
+ return true;
+
+ /*
+ * Without preemption, the prev may refer to the still active element
+ * which we refuse to let go.
+ *
+ * Even with preemption, there are times when we think it is better not
+ * to preempt and leave an ostensibly lower priority request in flight.
+ */
+ if (port_request(execlists->port) == prev)
+ return true;
+
+ return rq_prio(prev) >= rq_prio(next);
}
/*
@@ -523,6 +600,8 @@ static void inject_preempt_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
execlists_clear_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK);
execlists_set_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
+
+ (void)I915_SELFTEST_ONLY(execlists->preempt_hang.count++);
}
static void complete_preempt_context(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
@@ -591,7 +670,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
if (!execlists_is_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK))
return;
- if (need_preempt(engine, last, execlists->queue_priority_hint)) {
+ if (need_preempt(engine, last)) {
inject_preempt_context(engine);
return;
}
@@ -637,8 +716,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
int i;
priolist_for_each_request_consume(rq, rn, p, i) {
- GEM_BUG_ON(last &&
- need_preempt(engine, last, rq_prio(rq)));
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!assert_priority_queue(execlists, last, rq));
/*
* Can we combine this request with the current port?
@@ -884,6 +962,8 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
const u32 * const buf = execlists->csb_status;
u8 head, tail;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline.lock);
+
/*
* Note that csb_write, csb_status may be either in HWSP or mmio.
* When reading from the csb_write mmio register, we have to be
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
index d2324ed78e69..9647f8f04679 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
@@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ struct i915_priolist {
struct st_preempt_hang {
struct completion completion;
+ unsigned int count;
bool inject_hang;
};
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_lrc.c
index 2b2ecd76c2ac..58f534a39118 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_lrc.c
@@ -268,6 +268,143 @@ static int live_late_preempt(void *arg)
goto err_ctx_lo;
}
+struct preempt_client {
+ struct igt_spinner spin;
+ struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
+};
+
+static int preempt_client_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+ struct preempt_client *c)
+{
+ c->ctx = kernel_context(i915);
+ if (!c->ctx)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ if (igt_spinner_init(&c->spin, i915))
+ goto err_ctx;
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_ctx:
+ kernel_context_close(c->ctx);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+static void preempt_client_fini(struct preempt_client *c)
+{
+ igt_spinner_fini(&c->spin);
+ kernel_context_close(c->ctx);
+}
+
+static int live_suppress_preempt(void *arg)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
+ struct i915_sched_attr attr = {
+ .priority = I915_USER_PRIORITY(I915_PRIORITY_MAX)
+ };
+ struct preempt_client a, b;
+ enum intel_engine_id id;
+ intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
+ int err = -ENOMEM;
+
+ /*
+ * Verify that if a preemption request does not cause a change in
+ * the current execution order, the preempt-to-idle injection is
+ * skipped and that we do not accidentally apply it after the CS
+ * completion event.
+ */
+
+ if (!HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(i915))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(i915))
+ return 0; /* presume black blox */
+
+ mutex_lock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
+ wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(i915);
+
+ if (preempt_client_init(i915, &a))
+ goto err_unlock;
+ if (preempt_client_init(i915, &b))
+ goto err_client_a;
+
+ for_each_engine(engine, i915, id) {
+ struct i915_request *rq_a, *rq_b;
+ int depth;
+
+ engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count = 0;
+
+ rq_a = igt_spinner_create_request(&a.spin,
+ a.ctx, engine,
+ MI_NOOP);
+ if (IS_ERR(rq_a)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(rq_a);
+ goto err_client_b;
+ }
+
+ i915_request_add(rq_a);
+ if (!igt_wait_for_spinner(&a.spin, rq_a)) {
+ pr_err("First client failed to start\n");
+ goto err_wedged;
+ }
+
+ for (depth = 0; depth < 8; depth++) {
+ rq_b = igt_spinner_create_request(&b.spin,
+ b.ctx, engine,
+ MI_NOOP);
+ if (IS_ERR(rq_b)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(rq_b);
+ goto err_client_b;
+ }
+ i915_request_add(rq_b);
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_completed(rq_a));
+ engine->schedule(rq_a, &attr);
+ igt_spinner_end(&a.spin);
+
+ if (!igt_wait_for_spinner(&b.spin, rq_b)) {
+ pr_err("Second client failed to start\n");
+ goto err_wedged;
+ }
+
+ swap(a, b);
+ rq_a = rq_b;
+ }
+ igt_spinner_end(&a.spin);
+
+ if (engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count) {
+ pr_err("Preemption recorded x%d, depth %d; should have been suppressed!\n",
+ engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count,
+ depth);
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_client_b;
+ }
+
+ if (igt_flush_test(i915, I915_WAIT_LOCKED))
+ goto err_wedged;
+ }
+
+ err = 0;
+err_client_b:
+ preempt_client_fini(&b);
+err_client_a:
+ preempt_client_fini(&a);
+err_unlock:
+ if (igt_flush_test(i915, I915_WAIT_LOCKED))
+ err = -EIO;
+ intel_runtime_pm_put(i915, wakeref);
+ mutex_unlock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
+ return err;
+
+err_wedged:
+ igt_spinner_end(&b.spin);
+ igt_spinner_end(&a.spin);
+ i915_gem_set_wedged(i915);
+ err = -EIO;
+ goto err_client_b;
+}
+
static int live_preempt_hang(void *arg)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
@@ -647,6 +784,7 @@ int intel_execlists_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
SUBTEST(live_sanitycheck),
SUBTEST(live_preempt),
SUBTEST(live_late_preempt),
+ SUBTEST(live_suppress_preempt),
SUBTEST(live_preempt_hang),
SUBTEST(live_preempt_smoke),
};
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
