Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-01-25 14:26:49) > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-01-25 13:54:05) > > > > On 25/01/2019 02:29, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > + > > > + requests[n] = i915_request_get(rq); > > > + i915_request_add(rq); > > > + > > > + mutex_unlock(BKL); > > > + > > > + if (err >= 0) > > > + err = i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(wait, > > > + &rq->fence, > > > + 0, > > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > > > If above is true why this can't simply be i915_request_enable_breadcrumbs? > > I was trying to test breadcrumbs at a high level without 'cheating'. > > For i915_request_enable_breadcrumbs, I keep thinking the test should be > asking if the engine then has it on its signaling list, but that feels > like a circular argument, directly following the implementation itself > > > > + if (err < 0) { > > > > else if? > > Now where would I be able to copy'n'paste that from? ;) Actually, no. If it is separate, I'll give you a newline instead. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx