Re: [PATCH 27/34] drm/i915: Remove the intel_engine_notify tracepoint

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 21/01/2019 22:21, Chris Wilson wrote:
The global seqno is defunct and so we have no meaningful indicator of
forward progress for an engine. You need to listen to the request
signaling tracepoints instead.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c   |  2 --
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 25 -------------------------
  2 files changed, 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 5fd5080c4ccb..71d11dc2c235 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1209,8 +1209,6 @@ static void notify_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  		wake_up_process(tsk);
rcu_read_unlock();
-
-	trace_intel_engine_notify(engine, wait);
  }
static void vlv_c0_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
index 33d90eca9cdd..cb5bc65d575d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
@@ -750,31 +750,6 @@ trace_i915_request_out(struct i915_request *rq)
  #endif
  #endif
-TRACE_EVENT(intel_engine_notify,
-	    TP_PROTO(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, bool waiters),
-	    TP_ARGS(engine, waiters),
-
-	    TP_STRUCT__entry(
-			     __field(u32, dev)
-			     __field(u16, class)
-			     __field(u16, instance)
-			     __field(u32, seqno)
-			     __field(bool, waiters)
-			     ),
-
-	    TP_fast_assign(
-			   __entry->dev = engine->i915->drm.primary->index;
-			   __entry->class = engine->uabi_class;
-			   __entry->instance = engine->instance;
-			   __entry->seqno = intel_engine_get_seqno(engine);
-			   __entry->waiters = waiters;
-			   ),
-
-	    TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, seqno=%u, waiters=%u",
-		      __entry->dev, __entry->class, __entry->instance,
-		      __entry->seqno, __entry->waiters)
-);
-
  DEFINE_EVENT(i915_request, i915_request_retire,
  	    TP_PROTO(struct i915_request *rq),
  	    TP_ARGS(rq)


I cannot decide if keeping what we can would make it useful. Certainly not for debugging intel_engine_breadcrumbs_irq.. a sequence of intel_engine_notify(dev, class, instance) -> dma_fence_signaled would be a very unreliable trace of what engine actually executed something. What do you think?

Regards,

Tvrtko



_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux