On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 at 23:41, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Some tests (e.g. igt_vma_pin1) presume that we have a completely clean > GGTT so that it can probe boundaries without fear that something is > already allocated there. However, the mock device is starting to get > complicated and following similar rules to the live device, i.e. we > can't guarantee that i915->ggtt remains clean, so create a temporary > address_space equivalent to the mock ggtt for the purpose. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
