On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:10:18PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Hi Daniel. > > > v5: Actually try to sort them, and while at it, sort all the ones I > > touch. > > Applied this variant on top of drm-misc and did a build test. > Looked good for ia64, x86 and alpha. > > Took a closer look at the changes to atmel_hlcd - and they looked OK. > > But I noticed that atmel_hlcdc uses only drm_kms_helper_poll_init() and > drm_kms_helper_poll_fini(). > But there are no hits on DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL - so I think we maybe > have a driver here where we have plugged the drm_poll infrastructure, > but it is not in use. > > > include/drm/drm_crtc_helper.h | 16 ----------- > > The list of include files in this file could be dropped and replaced by: > struct drm_connector; > struct drm_device; > struct drm_display_mode; > struct drm_encoder; > struct drm_framebuffer; > struct drm_mode_set; > struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx; > > I tried to do so on top of your patch. > But there were too many build errros and I somehow lost the motivation. Yeah the drm_crtc_helper.h header is a bit the miniature drmP.h for legacy kms drivers. Just removing it from all the atomic drivers caused lots of fallout, I expect even more if you entirely remove the includes it has. Maybe a todo, care to pls create that patch since it's your idea? -Daniel > > > > include/drm/drm_probe_helper.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++ > This on the other hand is fine - as expected as this is a new file. > > But the above is just some random comments so: > > Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
