Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-01-15 11:56:11) > Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Make i915_gem_set_wedged() and i915_gem_unset_wedged() behaviour more > > consistently if called concurrently. > > More is needed in here. The purpose is to make them wait in turns > on top of mutex, instead of racing on the bit? Where is > the inconsistency tho. We report set-wedged multiple times on failure paths. Worse is when we report set-wedged multiple times simultaneously. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
