Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Removing polling for struct_mutex from vmap shrinker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 09/01/2019 16:42, Chris Wilson wrote:
The wait-for-idle used from within the shrinker_lock_uninterruptible
depends on the struct_mutex locking state being known and declared to
i915_request_wait(). As it is conceivable that we reach the vmap
notifier from underneath struct_mutex (and so keep on relying on the
mutex_trylock_recursive), we should not blindly call i915_request_wait.

In the process we can remove the dubious polling to acquire
struct_mutex, and simply act, or not, on a successful trylock.

Makes sense and removes the special casing. I only miss the historical reference as to why did vmap notifier need this special handling?

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 35 +++---------------------
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
index 8ad9519779cc..6cc2b964c955 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
@@ -385,31 +385,6 @@ i915_gem_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
  	return sc->nr_scanned ? freed : SHRINK_STOP;
  }
-static bool
-shrinker_lock_uninterruptible(struct drm_i915_private *i915, bool *unlock,
-			      int timeout_ms)
-{
-	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(timeout_ms);
-
-	do {
-		if (i915_gem_wait_for_idle(i915,
-					   0, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT) == 0 &&
-		    shrinker_lock(i915, 0, unlock))
-			break;
-
-		schedule_timeout_killable(1);
-		if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
-			return false;
-
-		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
-			pr_err("Unable to lock GPU to purge memory.\n");
-			return false;
-		}
-	} while (1);
-
-	return true;
-}
-
  static int
  i915_gem_shrinker_oom(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, void *ptr)
  {
@@ -461,16 +436,14 @@ i915_gem_shrinker_vmap(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, void *ptr
  	struct i915_vma *vma, *next;
  	unsigned long freed_pages = 0;
  	bool unlock;
-	int ret;
- if (!shrinker_lock_uninterruptible(i915, &unlock, 5000))
+	if (!shrinker_lock(i915, 0, &unlock))
  		return NOTIFY_DONE;
/* Force everything onto the inactive lists */
-	ret = i915_gem_wait_for_idle(i915,
-				     I915_WAIT_LOCKED,
-				     MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
-	if (ret)
+	if (i915_gem_wait_for_idle(i915,
+				   I915_WAIT_LOCKED,
+				   MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT))
  		goto out;
intel_runtime_pm_get(i915);


Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux