Quoting Patchwork (2019-01-07 17:10:25) > #### Possible regressions #### > > * igt@i915_missed_irq: > - shard-snb: PASS -> FAIL > - shard-kbl: PASS -> FAIL > - shard-hsw: PASS -> FAIL > - shard-skl: PASS -> FAIL > - shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL > - shard-apl: PASS -> FAIL It's not really a bug, just a failure in how we test. (Not that I could think of a better test.) The issue is that since we have coupled together the waiting + dma_fence, every time we retire/signal the fences, we remove the waiter. So in this test, the retire worker runs in the background signaling all the fences before the intel_breadcrumbs_hangcheck runs -- so we never see the missed interrupt as we do asynchronous polling. My conclusion is a patch to just remove the fake_irq as we do not need it anymore. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
