On 14/12/2018 13:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-12-14 12:34:47)
+static int get_sseu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
+ struct drm_i915_gem_context_param *args)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_gem_context_param_sseu user_sseu;
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
+ struct intel_context *ce;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (args->size == 0)
+ goto out;
+ else if (args->size < sizeof(user_sseu))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (copy_from_user(&user_sseu, u64_to_user_ptr(args->value),
+ sizeof(user_sseu)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ if (user_sseu.rsvd1 || user_sseu.rsvd2)
+ return -EINVAL;
I'd vote for s/rsvd2/flags/ straight away as already I can suggest we
allow for USE_CTX_ENGINE to swap class/instance for engine-id so that we
can set rpcs for, and not least, a virtual engine.
Hm.. would it be useful? It would just be a way of indirection.
engines = [vcs:0, vcs:1]
ctx.set_map(engines)
And then a):
foreach engine in engines:
ctx.set_sseu(engine, flags=0)
vs b):
for i = 0; i < len(engines); i++:
ctx.set_sseu(i, flags=USE_CTX_ENGINE)
So I don't see any benefit. But maybe I missed your idea.
Regards,
Tvrtko
+
+ engine = intel_engine_lookup_user(ctx->i915,
+ user_sseu.class,
+ user_sseu.instance);
+ if (!engine)
+ return -EINVAL;
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
