Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/uc: add dev_priv parameter to intel_uc_is_using_* functions

[Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 27/12/2018 14:33, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Reveals the build fail fixed in the last hunk. Also prep work.
>
> v2: name it i915 instead of dev_priv (Michal)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h    |  6 +++---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c    | 12 ++++++------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h    |  6 +++---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c |  2 +-
>   4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index d44255a8655e..c60cf17e50a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2490,9 +2490,9 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   #define HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv)	(HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
>   
>   /* Having a GuC is not the same as using a GuC */
> -#define USES_GUC(dev_priv)		intel_uc_is_using_guc()
> -#define USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv)	intel_uc_is_using_guc_submission()
> -#define USES_HUC(dev_priv)		intel_uc_is_using_huc()
> +#define USES_GUC(dev_priv)		intel_uc_is_using_guc(dev_priv)
> +#define USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv)	intel_uc_is_using_guc_submission(dev_priv)
> +#define USES_HUC(dev_priv)		intel_uc_is_using_huc(dev_priv)
>   
>   #define HAS_POOLED_EU(dev_priv)	((dev_priv)->info.has_pooled_eu)
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> index 447b1de77cc7..731b82afe636 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int __get_default_guc_log_level(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>   {
>   	int guc_log_level;
>   
> -	if (!HAS_GUC(i915) || !intel_uc_is_using_guc())
> +	if (!HAS_GUC(i915) || !intel_uc_is_using_guc(i915))
>   		guc_log_level = GUC_LOG_LEVEL_DISABLED;
>   	else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG) ||
>   		 IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM))
> @@ -112,11 +112,11 @@ static void sanitize_options_early(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>   
>   	DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("enable_guc=%d (submission:%s huc:%s)\n",
>   			 i915_modparams.enable_guc,
> -			 yesno(intel_uc_is_using_guc_submission()),
> -			 yesno(intel_uc_is_using_huc()));
> +			 yesno(intel_uc_is_using_guc_submission(i915)),
> +			 yesno(intel_uc_is_using_huc(i915)));
>   
>   	/* Verify GuC firmware availability */
> -	if (intel_uc_is_using_guc() && !intel_uc_fw_is_selected(guc_fw)) {
> +	if (intel_uc_is_using_guc(i915) && !intel_uc_fw_is_selected(guc_fw)) {
>   		DRM_WARN("Incompatible option detected: %s=%d, %s!\n",
>   			 "enable_guc", i915_modparams.enable_guc,
>   			 !HAS_GUC(i915) ? "no GuC hardware" :
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void sanitize_options_early(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>   	}
>   
>   	/* Verify HuC firmware availability */
> -	if (intel_uc_is_using_huc() && !intel_uc_fw_is_selected(huc_fw)) {
> +	if (intel_uc_is_using_huc(i915) && !intel_uc_fw_is_selected(huc_fw)) {
>   		DRM_WARN("Incompatible option detected: %s=%d, %s!\n",
>   			 "enable_guc", i915_modparams.enable_guc,
>   			 !HAS_HUC(i915) ? "no HuC hardware" :
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static void sanitize_options_early(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>   		i915_modparams.guc_log_level =
>   			__get_default_guc_log_level(i915);
>   
> -	if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level > 0 && !intel_uc_is_using_guc()) {
> +	if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level > 0 && !intel_uc_is_using_guc(i915)) {
>   		DRM_WARN("Incompatible option detected: %s=%d, %s!\n",
>   			 "guc_log_level", i915_modparams.guc_log_level,
>   			 !HAS_GUC(i915) ? "no GuC hardware" :
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> index 25d73ada74ae..870faf9011b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> @@ -41,19 +41,19 @@ void intel_uc_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>   int intel_uc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>   int intel_uc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>   
> -static inline bool intel_uc_is_using_guc(void)
> +static inline bool intel_uc_is_using_guc(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>   {
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_modparams.enable_guc < 0);
>   	return i915_modparams.enable_guc > 0;
>   }
>   
> -static inline bool intel_uc_is_using_guc_submission(void)
> +static inline bool intel_uc_is_using_guc_submission(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>   {
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_modparams.enable_guc < 0);
>   	return i915_modparams.enable_guc & ENABLE_GUC_SUBMISSION;
>   }
>   
> -static inline bool intel_uc_is_using_huc(void)
> +static inline bool intel_uc_is_using_huc(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>   {
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_modparams.enable_guc < 0);
>   	return i915_modparams.enable_guc & ENABLE_GUC_LOAD_HUC;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> index 630c887682e8..f82a415ea2ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ int intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
>   	u32 guc_wopcm_rsvd;
>   	int err;
>   
> -	if (!USES_GUC(dev_priv))
> +	if (!USES_GUC(i915))

Sadly even in this short file there is no consistency. 
(intel_wopcm_init_hw uses dev_priv.)

>   		return 0;
>   
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->size);

Anyways,

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx