Re: I messed up drm-intel-next-queued!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Hans,

I’m traveling on vacation and didn’t bring my laptop. I believe Joonas and Jani are out this week as well.

I’m in favor of the forced push if you are sure you have the latest one with you.

In case you are not sure about the latest sabe head:
I had done a drm-intel-next tag last Friday... so worst case we could reator to the drive-update-date commit and ask around to see if someone had merged other patches after that and re-push.

Merry Christmas,
Rodrigo.


> On Dec 24, 2018, at 8:39 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Ugh, I just messed up drm-intel-next-queued big time.
> 
> I somehow rebased my work on top of drm-tip (I believe I did the rebase
> in the wrong dir) and then after running a bunch of tests I
> did a "dim push-branch drm-intel-next-queued" which pushed the
> patches I intended to push rebased on top of drm-tip
> pushing drm-tip to dinq :(
> 
> I'm so sorry about this.
> 
> I just checked my reflog and the last commit before me messing
> up is commit d4de753526f4d99f541f1b6ed1d963005c09700c
> ("drm/i915: Unwind failure on pinning the gen7 ppgtt")
> 
> I think we should do a forced push to restore this, but
> I don't want to make things worse, so hence this email.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux