On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 10:57, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:22 PM Vincent Guittot > <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 15:36, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 15:22, Vincent Guittot > > > <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > With jiffies been replaced by raw ns in PM core accounting, 915 driver is > > > > updated to use this new time infrastructure. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 12 ++++++------ > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h | 4 ++-- > > > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c > > > > index d6c8f8f..cf6437d 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c > > > > @@ -493,14 +493,14 @@ static u64 get_rc6(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > */ > > > > if (kdev->power.runtime_status == RPM_SUSPENDED) { > > > > if (!i915->pmu.sample[__I915_SAMPLE_RC6_ESTIMATED].cur) > > > > - i915->pmu.suspended_jiffies_last = > > > > - kdev->power.suspended_jiffies; > > > > + i915->pmu.suspended_time_last = > > > > + kdev->power.suspended_time; > > > > > > > > > > Huh, so patch 2 introduces a complier error because of removing the > > > old fields. We can't have that. > > > > I agree > > The patch was mainly to raise discussion > > OK, so patch [1/3] from this series should be applicable regardless, right? Yes _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx