On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 05:20:10PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > OK, no real objections to the thing. Just so long we're all on the same > > page as to what it does and doesn't do ;-) > > I am not really sure whether there are other potential users besides > this one and whether the check as such is justified. It's a debug option... > > I suppose you could extend the check to include schedule_debug() as > > well, maybe something like: > > Do you mean to make the check cheaper? Nah, so the patch only touched might_sleep(), the below touches schedule(). If there were a patch that hits schedule() without going through a might_sleep() (rare in practise I think, but entirely possible) then you won't get a splat without something like the below on top. > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > > index f66920173370..b1aaa278f1af 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > > @@ -3278,13 +3278,18 @@ static noinline void __schedule_bug(struct task_struct *prev) > > /* > > * Various schedule()-time debugging checks and statistics: > > */ > > -static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev) > > +static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev, bool preempt) > > { > > #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_STACK_END_CHECK > > if (task_stack_end_corrupted(prev)) > > panic("corrupted stack end detected inside scheduler\n"); > > #endif > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP > > + if (!preempt && prev->state && prev->non_block_count) > > + // splat > > +#endif > > + > > if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off())) { > > __schedule_bug(prev); > > preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_DISABLED); > > @@ -3391,7 +3396,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt) > > rq = cpu_rq(cpu); > > prev = rq->curr; > > > > - schedule_debug(prev); > > + schedule_debug(prev, preempt); > > > > if (sched_feat(HRTICK)) > > hrtick_clear(rq); > > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx