On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:59:53PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2018-11-30 21:33:03) > > From: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > The MOCS tables are going to be very similar across platforms. > > > > To reduce the amount of copied code, this patch rips the common part and > > puts it into a definition valid for all gen9 platforms. > > > > v2: Made defines for or-ing flags. Renamed macros from MOCS_TABLE > > to MOCS_ENTRIES. (Joonas) > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@xxxxxxxxx> > > Suggested-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> (v1) > > Lucas, this needs your s-o-b if you are sending it for inclusion (to > state that you do have the legal authority to do so). Did I misunderstand the meaning of the CI tag? These are exactly the same commits as https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/51258/ I'm only sending again to get them to run properly on CI since patchwork got confused with the in-reply-to used there. And I'm not going to apply these myself, so adding the s-o-b didn't seem appropriate. Lucas De Marchi > -Chris > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
