On 26/11/2018 06:51, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 00:46:47 +0200, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
<daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
/snip/
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
index 8382d591c784..1a853cc627e3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
@@ -687,6 +687,13 @@ enum intel_guc_report_status {
INTEL_GUC_REPORT_STATUS_COMPLETE = 0x4,
};
+enum intel_guc_sleep_state_status {
+ INTEL_GUC_SLEEP_STATE_SUCCESS = 0x0,
+ INTEL_GUC_SLEEP_STATE_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE_FAILED = 0x1,
+ INTEL_GUC_SLEEP_STATE_ENGINE_RESET_FAILED = 0x2
+};
btw, it used to be 0,1,2 but from some time fw defines above as:
INTEL_GUC_SLEEP_STATE_SUCCESS = 0x1,
INTEL_GUC_SLEEP_STATE_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE_FAILED = 0x2,
INTEL_GUC_SLEEP_STATE_ENGINE_RESET_FAILED = 0x3,
Michal
Yeah, I think I had already mentioned in some reply that the newer
firmware does suspend/resume differently, but I haven't looked at the
details. I'm not even sure if polling the register will still be required.
Daniele
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
