Op 07-11-18 om 21:48 schreef Sean Paul: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 09:31:51PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 9:29 PM Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 09:18:16PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 12:58:56PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>>>> Hey Dave, >>>>> >>>>> First pull for drm-next this cycle. There's been a lot of changes, so I >>>>> hope I recorded everything from the changelog correctly. >>>>> >>>>> drm-misc-next-2018-11-07: >>>>> drm-misc-next for v4.21, part 1: >>>>> >>>>> UAPI Changes: >>>>> - Add syncobj timeline support to drm. >>>> With all the CI breakage this caused I kinda missed that it didn't get >>>> reverted. But afaict this didn't have the ack from anv/radv folks (which I >>>> explicitly asked for as part of what I think should be the merge >>>> criteria), and I'm not sure where the userspace is, and this here isn't >>>> just prep, but already adds new uapi. >>>> >>> +Christian >>> >>> Can you please land the revert while we get this sorted out? >> The revert was for the CI breakage, which is sorted out differently >> already. That was kinda just my excuse for not being in the loop. For >> just the uapi disallowing timeline obj creation and moving the #define >> away from the uapi include is all that's really needed. > Yeah, the uapi #define looked simple enough to back out. Whatever unblocks us > from moving forward is good with me. > > That said, reading through the review thread, this doesn't seem like something > that should have been applied in the first place. I didn't follow the syncobj breakage much, but yeah would be good to have it fixed first. I'll send a new pull req when the revert is applied. :) _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
