On 06/11/2018 18:29, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
We have a subslice mask per slice, not per subslice.
MAX_SUBSLICES > MAX_SLICES, so the wrong size didn't cause any issue
apart from using extra memory.
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
Indeed!
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
-
Lionel
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
index 86ce1db1b33a..88f97210dc49 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ enum intel_ppgtt {
struct sseu_dev_info {
u8 slice_mask;
- u8 subslice_mask[GEN_MAX_SUBSLICES];
+ u8 subslice_mask[GEN_MAX_SLICES];
u16 eu_total;
u8 eu_per_subslice;
u8 min_eu_in_pool;
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
