Re: [v4 6/7] i915/dp/fec: Configure the Forward Error Correction bits.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 2:08 PM
>To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Singh, Gaurav K <gaurav.k.singh@xxxxxxxxx>;
>Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Navare, Manasi D
><manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [v4 6/7] i915/dp/fec: Configure the Forward Error Correction bits.
>
>On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 05:45:16PM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
>> If FEC is supported, the corresponding DP_TP_CTL register bits have to
>> be configured.
>>
>> The driver has to program the FEC_ENABLE in DP_TP_CTL[30] register and
>> wait till FEC_STATUS in DP_TP_CTL[28] is 1.
>> Also add the warn message to make sure that the control register is
>> already active while enabling FEC.
>>
>> v2:
>> - Change commit message. Configure fec state after
>>   link training (Manasi, Gaurav)
>> - Remove redundent checks (Manasi)
>> - Remove the registers that get added automagically (Anusha)
>>
>> v3: s/intel_dp_set_fec_state()/intel_dp_enable_fec_state() (Gaurav)
>>
>> v4: rebased.
>>
>> v5:
>> - Move the code to the proper spot, according to spec.(Ville)
>> - Use fec state as a check too.
>>
>> Cc: Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.singh@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h  |  2 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  2 ++
>>  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index e85f53cb9cdd..8b1753939299
>> 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -9134,6 +9134,7 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>>  #define _DP_TP_CTL_B			0x64140
>>  #define DP_TP_CTL(port) _MMIO_PORT(port, _DP_TP_CTL_A, _DP_TP_CTL_B)
>>  #define  DP_TP_CTL_ENABLE			(1 << 31)
>> +#define  DP_TP_CTL_FEC_ENABLE			(1 << 30)
>>  #define  DP_TP_CTL_MODE_SST			(0 << 27)
>>  #define  DP_TP_CTL_MODE_MST			(1 << 27)
>>  #define  DP_TP_CTL_FORCE_ACT			(1 << 25)
>> @@ -9152,6 +9153,7 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>>  #define _DP_TP_STATUS_A			0x64044
>>  #define _DP_TP_STATUS_B			0x64144
>>  #define DP_TP_STATUS(port) _MMIO_PORT(port, _DP_TP_STATUS_A,
>> _DP_TP_STATUS_B)
>> +#define  DP_TP_STATUS_FEC_ENABLE_LIVE		(1 << 28)
>>  #define  DP_TP_STATUS_IDLE_DONE			(1 << 25)
>>  #define  DP_TP_STATUS_ACT_SENT			(1 << 24)
>>  #define  DP_TP_STATUS_MODE_STATUS_MST		(1 << 23)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> index efbada95dc4e..f03f44f332c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> @@ -2889,6 +2889,32 @@ static void intel_ddi_clk_disable(struct
>intel_encoder *encoder)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>
>> +void intel_dp_enable_fec_state(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> +			       const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>
>Can be static. intel_ddi_enable_fec() seems like a better name, and we can just
>pass the intel_encoder to this I think. No need to do all the "intel_dp to encoder"
>gynmastics then.
intel_ddi_enable_fec() is a better name. 

>> +{
>> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>> +	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>> +	enum port port = intel_dig_port->base.port;
>> +	u32 val;
>> +
>> +	/* FEC support exists for DP 1.4 only */
>
>This comment is misleading. There are other reasons besides < DP 1.4 for not
>using FEC. IMO just drop the comment.

Ok.

>> +	if (!crtc_state->fec_enable)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (!crtc_state->dsc_params.compression_enable)
>> +		return;
>
>That check can be removed now.
No we will still need this. The fec_enable state is not coupled with compression. So we have to check fec state and the compression ....

Anusha 
>> +
>> +	val = I915_READ(DP_TP_CTL(port));
>> +	val |= DP_TP_CTL_FEC_ENABLE;
>> +	I915_WRITE(DP_TP_CTL(port), val);
>> +
>> +	if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, DP_TP_STATUS(port),
>> +				    DP_TP_STATUS_FEC_ENABLE_LIVE,
>> +				    DP_TP_STATUS_FEC_ENABLE_LIVE,
>> +				    1))
>> +		DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for FEC Enable Status\n"); }
>> +
>>  static void intel_ddi_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>  				    const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>>  				    const struct drm_connector_state
>*conn_state) @@ -2934,9
>> +2960,13 @@ static void intel_ddi_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_encoder
>*encoder,
>>  					      DP_DECOMPRESSION_EN);
>>  	intel_dp_sink_set_fec_ready(intel_dp, crtc_state, DP_FEC_READY);
>>  	intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp);
>> +
>
>Unrelated whitespace change.
>
>>  	if (port != PORT_A || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
>>  		intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
>>
>> +	/* Set FEC state after link training */
>
>Redundant comment.
>
>> +	intel_dp_enable_fec_state(intel_dp, crtc_state);
>> +
>>  	icl_enable_phy_clock_gating(dig_port);
>>
>>  	if (!is_mst)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> index 2a080205968d..1cdfa9c5da43 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> @@ -1799,6 +1799,8 @@ void
>> intel_dp_sink_set_decompression_state(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,  void
>intel_dp_sink_set_fec_ready(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>  				 const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>>  				 int state);
>> +void intel_dp_enable_fec_state(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> +			       const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>  void intel_dp_encoder_reset(struct drm_encoder *encoder);  void
>> intel_dp_encoder_suspend(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder);  void
>> intel_dp_encoder_destroy(struct drm_encoder *encoder);
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>
>--
>Ville Syrjälä
>Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux