Am 25.10.18 um 09:51 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > Op 25-10-18 om 08:53 schreef Christian König: >> Am 25.10.18 um 03:28 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing): >>> Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@xxxxxxx> >> NAK, GFP_ATOMIC should be avoided. >> >> The correct solution is to move the allocation out of the spinlock or drop the lock and reacquire. > Yeah +1. Especially in a case like this where it's obvious to prevent. :) Another possibility would to not allocate the dummy fence at all. E.g. we just need a global instance of that which is always signaled and has a reference count of +1. Christian. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
