Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-10-24 11:51:58) > Forgot to add the description of this option in a previous commit. > > Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx> > Fixes: cd956bfcd0f58d ("drm/i915/perf: add a parameter to control the size of OA buffer") Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c > index 279432b1f0b6..fa295f05099c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c > @@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ static const struct i915_oa_format gen8_plus_oa_formats[I915_OA_FORMAT_MAX] = { > * @oa_format: An OA unit HW report format > * @oa_periodic: Whether to enable periodic OA unit sampling > * @oa_period_exponent: The OA unit sampling period is derived from this > + * @oa_buffer_size_exponent: The OA buffer size is derived from this For future, the preference is for inline kerneldoc for the members. Tighter coupling of doc to code/struct, and a bit more obvious when adding. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx