Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/i915: Fix unsigned overflow when calculating total data rate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Op 18-10-18 om 17:11 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 01:51:27PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> On gen11, we can definitely smash the 32-bits barrier with just a
>> when we enable all planes in the next patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 47 +++++++++++++++------------------
>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> index 67a4d0735291..3b136fdfd24f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> @@ -3784,7 +3784,7 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>>  
>>  static u16 intel_get_ddb_size(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  			      const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>> -			      const unsigned int total_data_rate,
>> +			      const u64 total_data_rate,
>>  			      const int num_active,
>>  			      struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb)
>>  {
>> @@ -3798,12 +3798,12 @@ static u16 intel_get_ddb_size(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  		return ddb_size - 4; /* 4 blocks for bypass path allocation */
>>  
>>  	adjusted_mode = &cstate->base.adjusted_mode;
>> -	total_data_bw = (u64)total_data_rate * drm_mode_vrefresh(adjusted_mode);
>> +	total_data_bw = total_data_rate * drm_mode_vrefresh(adjusted_mode);
>>  
>>  	/*
>>  	 * 12GB/s is maximum BW supported by single DBuf slice.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (total_data_bw >= GBps(12) || num_active > 1) {
>> +	if (num_active > 1 || total_data_bw >= GBps(12)) {
>>  		ddb->enabled_slices = 2;
>>  	} else {
>>  		ddb->enabled_slices = 1;
>> @@ -3816,7 +3816,7 @@ static u16 intel_get_ddb_size(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  static void
>>  skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_device *dev,
>>  				   const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>> -				   const unsigned int total_data_rate,
>> +				   const u64 total_data_rate,
>>  				   struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb,
>>  				   struct skl_ddb_entry *alloc, /* out */
>>  				   int *num_active /* out */)
>> @@ -4139,7 +4139,7 @@ int skl_check_pipe_max_pixel_rate(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static unsigned int
>> +static u64
>>  skl_plane_relative_data_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>>  			     const struct drm_plane_state *pstate,
>>  			     const int plane)
>> @@ -4151,6 +4151,7 @@ skl_plane_relative_data_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>>  	struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
>>  	u32 format;
>>  	uint_fixed_16_16_t down_scale_amount;
>> +	u64 rate;
>>  
>>  	if (!intel_pstate->base.visible)
>>  		return 0;
>> @@ -4177,28 +4178,26 @@ skl_plane_relative_data_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>>  		height /= 2;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	data_rate = width * height * fb->format->cpp[plane];
>> +	data_rate = width * height;
>>  
>>  	down_scale_amount = skl_plane_downscale_amount(cstate, intel_pstate);
>>  
>> -	return mul_round_up_u32_fixed16(data_rate, down_scale_amount);
>> +	rate = mul_round_up_u32_fixed16(data_rate, down_scale_amount);
>> +
>> +	rate *= fb->format->cpp[plane];
>> +	return rate;
>>  }
>>  
>> -/*
>> - * We don't overflow 32 bits. Worst case is 3 planes enabled, each fetching
>> - * a 8192x4096@32bpp framebuffer:
>> - *   3 * 4096 * 8192  * 4 < 2^32
>> - */
>> -static unsigned int
>> +static u64
>>  skl_get_total_relative_data_rate(struct intel_crtc_state *intel_cstate,
>> -				 unsigned int *plane_data_rate,
>> -				 unsigned int *uv_plane_data_rate)
>> +				 u64 *plane_data_rate,
>> +				 u64 *uv_plane_data_rate)
>>  {
>>  	struct drm_crtc_state *cstate = &intel_cstate->base;
>>  	struct drm_atomic_state *state = cstate->state;
>>  	struct drm_plane *plane;
>>  	const struct drm_plane_state *pstate;
>> -	unsigned int total_data_rate = 0;
>> +	u64 total_data_rate = 0;
>>  
>>  	if (WARN_ON(!state))
>>  		return 0;
>> @@ -4206,7 +4205,7 @@ skl_get_total_relative_data_rate(struct intel_crtc_state *intel_cstate,
>>  	/* Calculate and cache data rate for each plane */
>>  	drm_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state(plane, pstate, cstate) {
>>  		enum plane_id plane_id = to_intel_plane(plane)->id;
>> -		unsigned int rate;
>> +		u64 rate;
>>  
>>  		/* packed/y */
>>  		rate = skl_plane_relative_data_rate(intel_cstate,
>> @@ -4325,11 +4324,11 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>>  	uint16_t alloc_size, start;
>>  	uint16_t minimum[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
>>  	uint16_t uv_minimum[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
>> -	unsigned int total_data_rate;
>> +	u64 total_data_rate;
>>  	enum plane_id plane_id;
>>  	int num_active;
>> -	unsigned int plane_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
>> -	unsigned int uv_plane_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
>> +	u64 plane_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
>> +	u64 uv_plane_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
>>  	uint16_t total_min_blocks = 0;
>>  
>>  	/* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
>> @@ -4388,7 +4387,7 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>>  
>>  	start = alloc->start;
>>  	for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(intel_crtc, plane_id) {
>> -		unsigned int data_rate, uv_data_rate;
>> +		u64 data_rate, uv_data_rate;
>>  		uint16_t plane_blocks, uv_plane_blocks;
>>  
>>  		if (plane_id == PLANE_CURSOR)
>> @@ -4402,8 +4401,7 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>>  		 * result is < available as data_rate / total_data_rate < 1
>>  		 */
>>  		plane_blocks = minimum[plane_id];
>> -		plane_blocks += div_u64((uint64_t)alloc_size * data_rate,
>> -					total_data_rate);
>> +		plane_blocks += alloc_size * data_rate / total_data_rate;
> I failed to spot the raw 64bit divisions here. Fortunately CI caught
> them (yay). Need to be fixed.
No we can't, if we make the per plane data rate 64-bits, the divisor will overflow a div_u64..

~Maarten
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux