Re: [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: add pipe_htotal to struct skl_wm_params

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 03:01:32PM -0700, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> With this one here we can finally drop the intel state structures from
> the functions that compute watermark values: they all rely on struct
> skl_wm_params now. This should help the watermarks code be a little
> more clear on its intent and also match the spec a little bit more
> with the carefully chosen names for its parameters.

I guess we'll just roll with the duplication.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 20 ++++++++------------
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index b32d680d9bf0..4712eaea9744 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1254,6 +1254,7 @@ struct skl_wm_params {
>  	bool x_tiled, y_tiled;
>  	bool rc_surface;
>  	bool is_planar;
> +	uint32_t pipe_htotal;
>  	uint32_t width;
>  	uint16_t ddb_blocks;
>  	uint8_t cpp;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index d101c542f10d..b01f3d807ff6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4549,6 +4549,8 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  			 fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED_CCS;
>  	wp->is_planar = fb->format->format == DRM_FORMAT_NV12;
>  
> +	wp->pipe_htotal = cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal;
> +
>  	if (plane->id == PLANE_CURSOR) {
>  		wp->width = intel_pstate->base.crtc_w;
>  	} else {
> @@ -4630,7 +4632,6 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  }
>  
>  static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> -				struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>  				int level,
>  				const struct skl_wm_params *wp,
>  				const struct skl_wm_level *result_prev,
> @@ -4659,17 +4660,15 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  
>  	method1 = skl_wm_method1(dev_priv, wp->plane_pixel_rate,
>  				 wp->cpp, latency, wp->dbuf_block_size);
> -	method2 = skl_wm_method2(wp->plane_pixel_rate,
> -				 cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal,
> +	method2 = skl_wm_method2(wp->plane_pixel_rate, wp->pipe_htotal,
>  				 latency,
>  				 wp->plane_blocks_per_line);
>  
>  	if (wp->y_tiled) {
>  		selected_result = max_fixed16(method2, wp->y_tile_minimum);
>  	} else {
> -		if ((wp->cpp * cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal /
> -		     wp->dbuf_block_size < 1) &&
> -		     (wp->plane_bytes_per_line / wp->dbuf_block_size < 1)) {
> +		if ((wp->cpp * wp->pipe_htotal / wp->dbuf_block_size < 1) &&
> +		    (wp->plane_bytes_per_line / wp->dbuf_block_size < 1)) {
>  			selected_result = method2;
>  		} else if (wp->ddb_blocks >=
>  			 fixed16_to_u32_round_up(wp->plane_blocks_per_line)) {
> @@ -4782,7 +4781,6 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  
>  static int
>  skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> -		      struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>  		      const struct skl_wm_params *wm_params,
>  		      struct skl_plane_wm *wm,
>  		      int plane_id)
> @@ -4802,7 +4800,6 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  			result_prev = plane_id ? &wm->uv_wm[0] : &wm->wm[0];
>  
>  		ret = skl_compute_plane_wm(dev_priv,
> -					   cstate,
>  					   level,
>  					   wm_params,
>  					   result_prev,
> @@ -4937,8 +4934,7 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>  		if (!wm_params.plane_visible)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, cstate, &wm_params, wm,
> -					    0);
> +		ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, &wm_params, wm, 0);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[PLANE:%d:%s] failed to compute watermark levels\n",
>  				      plane->base.id, plane->name);
> @@ -4956,8 +4952,8 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>  			if (ret)
>  				return ret;
>  
> -			ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, cstate,
> -						    &wm_params, wm, 1);
> +			ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, &wm_params, wm,
> +						    1);
>  			if (ret) {
>  				DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[PLANE:%d:%s] failed to compute planar watermark levels\n",
>  					      plane->base.id, plane->name);
> -- 
> 2.14.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux