On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, "Sharma, Shashank" <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Regards > > Shashank > > > On 10/15/2018 4:39 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Fri, 05 Oct 2018, clinton.a.taylor@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>> From: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> HDMI Forum VSDB YCBCR420 deep color capability bits are 2:0. Correct >>>> definitions in the header for the mask to work correctly. >>>> >>>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107893 >>>> Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@xxxxxxxxx> >>> When posting fixes like this, please do git blame on the stuff you're >>> fixing, and add Fixes: tag and a bunch of Cc's. It'll help us propagate >>> the fix to stable kernels and get feedback from the authors and >>> reviewers. 'dim fixes' will help you with this: >>> >>> $ dim fixes e6a9a2c3dc437 >>> Fixes: e6a9a2c3dc43 ("drm/edid: parse ycbcr 420 deep color information") >>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Jose Abreu <joabreu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.14+ >>> >>> Anyway this looks sane to me, >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> but I'm wondering if there was some deeper meaning to the original |= in >>> there. > Honestly, I was considering new blocks in HDMI 2.1 spec for dc, and > parsing of those before this block, keeping |= required. > But we can always do other way around, or will take care of it when we > add code for it. > Just cross checked with the spec too, > > Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> Pushed to drm-misc-fixes, thanks for the patch and review! BR, Jani. > > - Shashank > >> PS. It'll be useful to repost this Cc: intel-gfx just to get the CI as >> we seem to be the only consumer of the stuff being fixed. >> >>> >>> BR, >>> Jani. >>> >>> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 2 +- >>>> include/drm/drm_edid.h | 6 +++--- >>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c >>>> index 1e2b940..ff0bfc6 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c >>>> @@ -4282,7 +4282,7 @@ static void drm_parse_ycbcr420_deep_color_info(struct drm_connector *connector, >>>> struct drm_hdmi_info *hdmi = &connector->display_info.hdmi; >>>> >>>> dc_mask = db[7] & DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_MASK; >>>> - hdmi->y420_dc_modes |= dc_mask; >>>> + hdmi->y420_dc_modes = dc_mask; >>>> } >>>> >>>> static void drm_parse_hdmi_forum_vsdb(struct drm_connector *connector, >>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_edid.h b/include/drm/drm_edid.h >>>> index b25d12e..e3c4048 100644 >>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_edid.h >>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_edid.h >>>> @@ -214,9 +214,9 @@ struct detailed_timing { >>>> #define DRM_EDID_HDMI_DC_Y444 (1 << 3) >>>> >>>> /* YCBCR 420 deep color modes */ >>>> -#define DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_48 (1 << 6) >>>> -#define DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_36 (1 << 5) >>>> -#define DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_30 (1 << 4) >>>> +#define DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_48 (1 << 2) >>>> +#define DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_36 (1 << 1) >>>> +#define DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_30 (1 << 0) >>>> #define DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_MASK (DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_48 | \ >>>> DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_36 | \ >>>> DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_30) > -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
