Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2018-10-16 00:43:59) > > > On 15/10/18 15:47, Patchwork wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/guc: fix GuC suspend/resume > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/51033/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4984 -> Patchwork_10464 = > > > > == Summary - FAILURE == > > > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_10464 absolutely need to be > > verified manually. > > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > > introduced in Patchwork_10464, please notify your bug team to allow them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/51033/revisions/1/mbox/ > > > > == Possible new issues == > > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_10464: > > > > === IGT changes === > > > > ==== Possible regressions ==== > > > > igt@drv_selftest@live_execlists: > > fi-skl-6700hq: PASS -> INCOMPLETE > > > > Log seem to be cut for this one. Since it is stopping inside > live_preempt_smoke it is probably a known issue that Chris mentioned. > Can't reproduce on my skylake even with the test in a loop. Yeah, if we have the oops report for that one it might have been clearer. > > > > igt@drv_selftest@live_hangcheck: > > fi-skl-gvtdvm: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL > > > > <7> [464.966238] [drm:guc_fw_xfer [i915]] GuC status 0x20 > <3> [464.966361] [drm:guc_fw_xfer [i915]] *ERROR* GuC firmware xfer > error -110 > > This looks like GuC is stuck very early in the boot flow (even before > the RSA check). On SKL there are known issues that could cause this and > we should reset GuC and retry, but we aren't. Looks like we indirectly > stopped applying WaEnableuKernelHeaderValidFix and > WaEnableGuCBootHashCheckNotSet by not returning -EAGAIN from > intel_guc_fw_upload in any case. Michal? That would be useful to fix, as it does fail regularly enough to be a nuisance. More importantly, no live_gem failures across the board so the patch does what it says on the tin. Nice work. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
