On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 16:35 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> For eDP panels all the DPCD and EDID data is cached when initializing
> the eDP connector so in futher detection it do not call
> intel_dp_detect_dpcd() for eDP.
> The problem is on the first short pulse interruption it calls
> intel_dp_get_dpcd() for eDP and DP and it will read and set the sink
> count, causing a mismatch between old sink count and the new one
> triggering a full detection without needed.
>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 19f0c3f59cbe..4a1c31ec9065 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3926,6 +3926,7 @@ intel_edp_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> to_i915(dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.dev);
> + u8 val;
>
> /* this function is meant to be called only once */
> WARN_ON(intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] != 0);
> @@ -3997,6 +3998,10 @@ intel_edp_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> intel_dp_set_common_rates(intel_dp);
>
> + if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SINK_COUNT, &val) <=
> 0)
> + return false;
> + intel_dp->sink_count = DP_GET_SINK_COUNT(val);
Is this even relevant for eDPs? Seems unnecessary to read or compare
sink count for eDP. I'd suggest skipping DP_SINK_COUNT checks for eDP.
-DK
> +
> return true;
> }
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
