Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Warn if request allocation stalls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 05/10/2018 09:02, Chris Wilson wrote:
Add a warning for an allocation stall to make it painfully more obvious
while debugging.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h     | 2 ++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 6 ++++++
  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
index 599c4f6eb1ea..e2db030fd75a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
  #define GEM_DEBUG_DECL(var) var
  #define GEM_DEBUG_EXEC(expr) expr
  #define GEM_DEBUG_BUG_ON(expr) GEM_BUG_ON(expr)
+#define GEM_DEBUG_WARN(expr...) WARN(expr)

Reminds me of one patch which would look so good preceding this one!

#else @@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
  #define GEM_DEBUG_DECL(var)
  #define GEM_DEBUG_EXEC(expr) do { } while (0)
  #define GEM_DEBUG_BUG_ON(expr)
+#define GEM_DEBUG_WARN(expr...) do { } while (0)
  #endif
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_TRACE_GEM)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index abd4dacbab8e..32bf2c9868bf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -647,6 +647,8 @@ i915_request_alloc(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
  	rq = kmem_cache_alloc(i915->requests,
  			      GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN);
  	if (unlikely(!rq)) {
+		GEM_DEBUG_DECL(ktime_t start = ktime_get());
+
  		i915_retire_requests(i915);
/* Ratelimit ourselves to prevent oom from malicious clients */
@@ -671,6 +673,10 @@ i915_request_alloc(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
  			ret = -ENOMEM;
  			goto err_unreserve;
  		}
+
+		GEM_DEBUG_WARN(ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), start) > 500,
+			       "request allocation delayed for %lldms\n",
+			       ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), start));

Usefulness of the arbitrary threshold vs source code pollution?

Regards,

Tvrtko

  	}
rq->rcustate = get_state_synchronize_rcu();

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux