On 01/10/2018 20:44, Chris Wilson wrote:
We do not need to continually clear our dedicated PTE for error capture
as it will be updated and invalidated to the next object. Only at the
end do we wish to be sure that the PTE doesn't point back to any buffer.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
index ed8c16cbfaa4..fed9574be5b6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
@@ -995,7 +995,6 @@ i915_error_object_create(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
}
compress_fini(&compress, dst);
- ggtt->vm.clear_range(&ggtt->vm, slot, PAGE_SIZE);
return dst;
}
@@ -1781,6 +1780,14 @@ static unsigned long capture_find_epoch(const struct i915_gpu_state *error)
return epoch;
}
+static void capture_finish(struct i915_gpu_state *error)
+{
+ struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = &error->i915->ggtt;
+ const u64 slot = ggtt->error_capture.start;
+
+ ggtt->vm.clear_range(&ggtt->vm, slot, PAGE_SIZE);
+}
+
static int capture(void *data)
{
struct i915_gpu_state *error = data;
@@ -1805,6 +1812,7 @@ static int capture(void *data)
error->epoch = capture_find_epoch(error);
+ capture_finish(error);
return 0;
}
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
