On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 09:13:09PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > If the display is disabled (e.g. the driver has disabled the KMS > interface) there is nothing to do so avoid failing. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Silently doing nothing feels funny, I think putting the igt_require into igt_display_init makes more sense with this one in mind. Also avoids the churn in patch 5. -Daniel > --- > lib/igt_kms.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/igt_kms.c b/lib/igt_kms.c > index 9710bcae1..dedc81344 100644 > --- a/lib/igt_kms.c > +++ b/lib/igt_kms.c > @@ -3271,6 +3271,9 @@ static int do_display_commit(igt_display_t *display, > enum pipe pipe; > LOG_INDENT(display, "commit"); > > + if (!display->n_pipes || !display->n_outputs) > + return 0; /* nothing to do */ > + > igt_display_refresh(display); > > if (s == COMMIT_ATOMIC) { > @@ -3321,6 +3324,9 @@ int igt_display_try_commit_atomic(igt_display_t *display, uint32_t flags, void * > { > int ret; > > + if (!display->n_pipes || !display->n_outputs) > + return 0; /* nothing to do */ > + > LOG_INDENT(display, "commit"); > > igt_display_refresh(display); > -- > 2.19.0 > > _______________________________________________ > igt-dev mailing list > igt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx