Re: [PATCH 15/40] drm/i915: Priority boost for new clients

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-09-25 09:01:06)
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-09-24 11:29:52)
> > 
> > On 19/09/2018 20:55, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
> > > index 7edfad0abfd7..93e43e263d8c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
> > > @@ -19,12 +19,14 @@ enum {
> > >       I915_PRIORITY_INVALID = INT_MIN
> > >   };
> > >   
> > > -#define I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT 0
> > > +#define I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT 1
> > >   #define I915_USER_PRIORITY(x) ((x) << I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT)
> > >   
> > >   #define I915_PRIORITY_COUNT BIT(I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT)
> > >   #define I915_PRIORITY_MASK (-I915_PRIORITY_COUNT)
> > >   
> > > +#define I915_PRIORITY_NEWCLIENT      ((u8)BIT(0))
> > 
> > Is the cast important and why?
> 
> Unreliable memory says there was something iffy about the code generation
> at one point.

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c: In function ‘__unwind_incomplete_requests’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c:272:13: error: overflow in conversion from ‘long unsigned int’ to ‘int’ changes value from ‘18446744071562067969’ to ‘-2147483647’ [-Werror=overflow]
  int prio = I915_PRIORITY_INVALID | I915_PRIORITY_NEWCLIENT;

-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux