On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 00:28 +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 13:43 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > eDP spec states 2 different bits to enable sink to trigger a
> > interruption when there is a CRC mismatch.
> > DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION is for PSR only and
> > DP_PSR_IRQ_HPD_WITH_CRC_ERRORS is for PSR2 only.
Do you have a system that triggers a short pulse for this? If yes, do
we end up calling the PSR error interrupt handler at all?
intel_dp_short_pulse()
...
if intel_dp_needs_link_retrain()
return
intel_psr_short_pulse()
> >
> > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > index 6f3c6f0c539f..b4edbbda8d71 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_sink(struct
> > intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> > if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
> > DP_RECEIVER_ALPM_CONFIG,
> > DP_ALPM_ENABLE);
> > - dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_ENABLE_PSR2;
> > + dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_ENABLE_PSR2 |
> > DP_PSR_IRQ_HPD_WITH_CRC_ERRORS;
> > }
>
> } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >=8) {
>
> dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION;
> }
>
> How about doing this for clarity?
>
>
>
> >
> > if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
