On 19/09/2018 20:55, Chris Wilson wrote:
Include the total size of closed vma when reporting the per_ctx_stats of
debugfs/i915_gem_objects.
Why do we need/want this?
Whilst adjusting the context tracking, note that we can simply use our
list of contexts in i915->contexts rather than circumlocute via
dev->filelist and the per-file context idr.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 113 +++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 2ac75bc10afa..6b5cc30f3e09 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ struct file_stats {
u64 total, unbound;
u64 global, shared;
u64 active, inactive;
+ u64 closed;
};
static int per_file_stats(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
@@ -336,6 +337,9 @@ static int per_file_stats(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
stats->active += vma->node.size;
else
stats->inactive += vma->node.size;
+
+ if (i915_vma_is_closed(vma))
+ stats->closed += vma->node.size;
We can have closed and active?
}
return 0;
@@ -343,7 +347,7 @@ static int per_file_stats(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
#define print_file_stats(m, name, stats) do { \
if (stats.count) \
- seq_printf(m, "%s: %lu objects, %llu bytes (%llu active, %llu inactive, %llu global, %llu shared, %llu unbound)\n", \
+ seq_printf(m, "%s: %lu objects, %llu bytes (%llu active, %llu inactive, %llu global, %llu shared, %llu unbound, %llu closed)\n", \
name, \
stats.count, \
stats.total, \
@@ -351,7 +355,8 @@ static int per_file_stats(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
stats.inactive, \
stats.global, \
stats.shared, \
- stats.unbound); \
+ stats.unbound, \
+ stats.closed); \
} while (0)
static void print_batch_pool_stats(struct seq_file *m,
@@ -377,44 +382,44 @@ static void print_batch_pool_stats(struct seq_file *m,
print_file_stats(m, "[k]batch pool", stats);
}
-static int per_file_ctx_stats(int idx, void *ptr, void *data)
+static void print_context_stats(struct seq_file *m,
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
- struct i915_gem_context *ctx = ptr;
- struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
- enum intel_engine_id id;
-
- for_each_engine(engine, ctx->i915, id) {
- struct intel_context *ce = to_intel_context(ctx, engine);
+ struct file_stats kstats = {};
+ struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
- if (ce->state)
- per_file_stats(0, ce->state->obj, data);
- if (ce->ring)
- per_file_stats(0, ce->ring->vma->obj, data);
- }
+ list_for_each_entry(ctx, &i915->contexts.list, link) {
+ struct file_stats stats = { .file_priv = ctx->file_priv };
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
+ enum intel_engine_id id;
- return 0;
-}
+ for_each_engine(engine, i915, id) {
+ struct intel_context *ce = to_intel_context(ctx, engine);
-static void print_context_stats(struct seq_file *m,
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
-{
- struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
- struct file_stats stats;
- struct drm_file *file;
+ if (ce->state)
+ per_file_stats(0, ce->state->obj, &kstats);
+ if (ce->ring)
+ per_file_stats(0, ce->ring->vma->obj, &kstats);
+ }
- memset(&stats, 0, sizeof(stats));
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(stats.file_priv)) {
+ struct drm_file *file = stats.file_priv->file;
+ struct task_struct *task;
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
- if (dev_priv->kernel_context)
- per_file_ctx_stats(0, dev_priv->kernel_context, &stats);
+ spin_lock(&file->table_lock);
+ idr_for_each(&file->object_idr, per_file_stats, &stats);
Headache inducing diff.. however, doesn't this over-account objects on
the account of walking the same file from multiple-contexts?
+ spin_unlock(&file->table_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(file, &dev->filelist, lhead) {
- struct drm_i915_file_private *fpriv = file->driver_priv;
- idr_for_each(&fpriv->context_idr, per_file_ctx_stats, &stats);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ task = pid_task(ctx->pid ?: file->pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
+ print_file_stats(m,
+ task ? task->comm : "<unknown>",
+ stats);
And this as well looks like it'll end up duplicated.
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ }
}
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
- print_file_stats(m, "[k]contexts", stats);
+ print_file_stats(m, "[k]contexts", kstats);
}
static int i915_gem_object_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
@@ -426,14 +431,9 @@ static int i915_gem_object_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
u64 size, mapped_size, purgeable_size, dpy_size, huge_size;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
unsigned int page_sizes = 0;
- struct drm_file *file;
char buf[80];
int ret;
- ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
seq_printf(m, "%u objects, %llu bytes\n",
dev_priv->mm.object_count,
dev_priv->mm.object_memory);
Noticed we technically need mm.object_stat_lock here for atomic readout,
but I guess we don't care much.
@@ -514,43 +514,14 @@ static int i915_gem_object_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
buf, sizeof(buf)));
seq_putc(m, '\n');
- print_batch_pool_stats(m, dev_priv);
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-
- mutex_lock(&dev->filelist_mutex);
- print_context_stats(m, dev_priv);
- list_for_each_entry_reverse(file, &dev->filelist, lhead) {
- struct file_stats stats;
- struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv = file->driver_priv;
- struct i915_request *request;
- struct task_struct *task;
-
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
- memset(&stats, 0, sizeof(stats));
- stats.file_priv = file->driver_priv;
- spin_lock(&file->table_lock);
- idr_for_each(&file->object_idr, per_file_stats, &stats);
- spin_unlock(&file->table_lock);
- /*
- * Although we have a valid reference on file->pid, that does
- * not guarantee that the task_struct who called get_pid() is
- * still alive (e.g. get_pid(current) => fork() => exit()).
- * Therefore, we need to protect this ->comm access using RCU.
- */
- request = list_first_entry_or_null(&file_priv->mm.request_list,
- struct i915_request,
- client_link);
- rcu_read_lock();
- task = pid_task(request && request->gem_context->pid ?
- request->gem_context->pid : file->pid,
- PIDTYPE_PID);
- print_file_stats(m, task ? task->comm : "<unknown>", stats);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
- }
- mutex_unlock(&dev->filelist_mutex);
+ print_batch_pool_stats(m, dev_priv);
+ print_context_stats(m, dev_priv);
+ mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
return 0;
}
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
