Re: [PATCH 12/40] drm/i915/execlists: Assert the queue is non-empty on unsubmitting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 19/09/2018 20:55, Chris Wilson wrote:
In the sequence

<0>[  531.960431] drv_self-4806    7.... 527402570us : intel_gpu_reset: engine_mask=1, ret=0, retry=0
<0>[  531.960431] drv_self-4806    7.... 527402571us : execlists_reset: rcs0 request global=115de, current=71133

How such a unbelievably huge delta between the guilty request and hws?

<0>[  531.960431] drv_self-4806    7d..1 527402571us : execlists_cancel_port_requests: rcs0:port0 global=71134 (fence 826b:198), (current 71133)
<0>[  531.960431] drv_self-4806    7d..1 527402572us : execlists_cancel_port_requests: rcs0:port1 global=71135 (fence 826c:53), (current 71133)
<0>[  531.960431] drv_self-4806    7d..1 527402572us : __i915_request_unsubmit: rcs0 fence 826c:53 <- global=71135, current 71133
<0>[  531.960431] drv_self-4806    7d..1 527402579us : __i915_request_unsubmit: rcs0 fence 826b:198 <- global=71134, current 71133
<0>[  531.960431] drv_self-4806    7.... 527402613us : intel_engine_cancel_stop_cs: rcs0
<0>[  531.960431] drv_self-4806    7.... 527402624us : execlists_reset_finish: rcs0

we are missing the execlists_submission_tasklet() invocation before the
execlists_reset_fini() implying that either the queue is empty, or we
failed to schedule and run the tasklet on finish. Add an assert so we
are sure that on unsubmitting the incomplete request after reset, the
queue is indeed populated.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 3edb417caa7b..e8de250c3413 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ static void __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  			last_prio = rq_prio(rq);
  			p = lookup_priolist(engine, last_prio);
  		}
+		GEM_BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&engine->execlists.queue.rb_root));
GEM_BUG_ON(p->priority != rq_prio(rq));
  		list_add(&rq->sched.link, &p->requests);


Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux