Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm: Fix syncobj handing of schedule() returning 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Daniel Vetter (2018-09-21 10:15:41)
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:07:20AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > After schedule() returns 0, we must do one last check of COND to
> > determine the reason for the wakeup with 0 jiffies remaining before
> > reporting the timeout -- otherwise we may lose the signal due to
> > scheduler delays.
> 
> Ah classic!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>

Indeed, thanks for the reviews, pushed to drm-misc-next.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux