Re: [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915/icl: No need to early bailout on interrupt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 20/09/18 07:33, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
Getting interrupt without any second level indications
is unlikely.

Do you have any numbers for this? I remember seeing empty interrupts quite often (i.e. up to 5-10%) in early testing on workloads submitting lots of no-ops due to the double buffering, when both events ended up being serviced by the first interrupt. The code was different at the time though, so those might just have been due to less optimal SW handing, but I'd be curious to see the numbers if you have any.

Thanks,
Daniele

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux