On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 20:30 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:20:09AM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > This way all short pulse handlers except MST are in one place. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > index 123c2eafafab..03d2c6426016 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > > @@ -4501,6 +4501,9 @@ intel_dp_short_pulse(struct intel_dp > > *intel_dp) > > drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(&dev_priv->drm); > > } > > > > + /* Short pulse can signify loss of hdcp authentication */ > > + intel_hdcp_check_link(intel_dp->attached_connector); > > + > > return true; > > } > > > > @@ -5634,9 +5637,6 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port > > *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd) > > > > handled = intel_dp_short_pulse(intel_dp); > > > > - /* Short pulse can signify loss of hdcp > > authentication */ > > - intel_hdcp_check_link(intel_dp- > > >attached_connector); > > - > > This changes the behaviour to skip intel_hdcp_check_link() when > intel_dp_short_pulse() decides to fall back to full detect. Not sure > if > that's OK or not. I'm thinking we should move the decision to fallback to the very end of intel_dp_short_pulse(). The benefit we get is to disable PSR if the sink complained of PSR errors and then check if the hardware retrained the link correctly after we disabled. > > > if (!handled) > > goto put_power; > > } > > -- > > 2.14.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
