[PATCH] drm/i915: Fix logic fumble in rotation vs. ccs check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Smatch reports:
../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c:1192 skl_plane_check_fb() warn: was || intended here instead of &&?

Obviously smatch is correct here since we're trying to check if we're
using either of the ccs modifiers. Since we now have is_ccs_modifier()
let's use it to fix this.

Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: e21c2d331018 ("drm/i915: Move skl plane fb related checks into a better place")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
index 8821e59b70ea..d4c8e10fc90b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
@@ -1190,8 +1190,7 @@ static int skl_plane_check_fb(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 		return 0;
 
 	if (rotation & ~(DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 | DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180) &&
-	    (fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED_CCS &&
-	     fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED_CCS)) {
+	    is_ccs_modifier(fb->modifier)) {
 		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("RC support only with 0/180 degree rotation (%x)\n",
 			      rotation);
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.16.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux