On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 06:06:01PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 04:52:34PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On 2018-09-13 4:29 p.m., Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 03:50:01PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > >> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 04:16:21PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > >>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >>> > > >>> We wish to control certain driver_features flags on a per-device basis > > >>> while still sharing a single drm_driver instance across all the > > >>> devices. To that end introduce device.driver_features. By default > > >>> it will be set to ~0 to not impose any limits beyond > > >>> driver.driver_features. Drivers can then clear specific flags > > >>> in the per-device bitmask to limit the capabilities of the device. > > >>> > > >>> An alternative approach would be to copy the driver_features from > > >>> the driver into the device in drm_dev_init(), however that would > > >>> require verifying that no driver is currently changing > > >>> driver.driver_features after drm_dev_init(). Hence the ~0 apporach > > >>> was easier. > > >>> > > >>> Ideally we'd also make drm_driver const but there is plenty of code > > >>> left that wants to mutate it (eg. various vfunc assignments). We'll > > >>> need to fix all that up before we can make it const. > > >>> > > >>> And while at it fix up the type of the feature flag passed to > > >>> drm_core_check_feature(). > > >>> > > >>> v2: Streamline the && vs. & (Chris) > > >>> s/int/u32/ in drm_core_check_feature() args > > >>> > > >>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> > > >> git grep DRIVER_ATOMIC -- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau has a 2nd supporting > > >> case for this. Exactly same problem as we have here. Would be good to also > > >> convert that one, for a bit of OCD. > > > > > > Thanks for pointing it out. I'll cook it up and send separately after > > > this lands. > > > > I don't suppose you'd like to do amdgpu as well, while you're at it? :) > > Sure. I'll take a gander at it as well. Series pushed to drm-misc-next. Thanks for the reviews. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx