Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-09-13 12:16:42) > > On 12/09/2018 17:40, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Under mempressure, our goal is to allow ourselves sufficient time to > > reclaim the RCU protected slabs without overly penalizing our clients. > > Currently, we use a 1 jiffie wait if the client is still active as a > > means of throttling the allocations, but we can instead wait for the end > > of the RCU grace period of the clients previous allocation. > > Why did you opt for three patches changing the same code and just squash > to last? 1 introduced a timeout, 2 limited it to the single timeline, 3 changed what we are waiting on entirely. Each of those are big jumps, and only (1) is required to fix the bug. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
