Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-09-06 11:18:01) > On 06/09/2018 11:10, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-09-06 10:57:47) > >> On 05/09/2018 15:22, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >>> From: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> If some of the contexts submitting workloads to the GPU have been > >>> configured to shutdown slices/subslices, we might loose the NOA > >>> configurations written in the NOA muxes. > >>> > >>> One possible solution to this problem is to reprogram the NOA muxes > >>> when we switch to a new context. We initially tried this in the > >>> workaround batchbuffer but some concerns where raised about the cost > >>> of reprogramming at every context switch. This solution is also not > >>> without consequences from the userspace point of view. Reprogramming > >>> of the muxes can only happen once the powergating configuration has > >>> changed (which happens after context switch). This means for a window > >>> of time during the recording, counters recorded by the OA unit might > >>> be invalid. This requires userspace dealing with OA reports to discard > >>> the invalid values. > >>> > >>> Minimizing the reprogramming could be implemented by tracking of the > >>> last programmed configuration somewhere in GGTT and use MI_PREDICATE > >>> to discard some of the programming commands, but the command streamer > >>> would still have to parse all the MI_LRI instructions in the > >>> workaround batchbuffer. > >>> > >>> Another solution, which this change implements, is to simply disregard > >>> the user requested configuration for the period of time when i915/perf > >>> is active. There is no known issue with this apart from a performance > >>> penality for some media workloads that benefit from running on a > >>> partially powergated GPU. We already prevent RC6 from affecting the > >>> programming so it doesn't sound completely unreasonable to hold on > >>> powergating for the same reason. > >>> > >>> v2: Leave RPCS programming in intel_lrc.c (Lionel) > >>> > >>> v3: Update for s/union intel_sseu/struct intel_sseu/ (Lionel) > >>> More to_intel_context() (Tvrtko) > >>> s/dev_priv/i915/ (Tvrtko) > >>> > >>> Tvrtko Ursulin: > >>> > >>> v4: > >>> * Rebase for make_rpcs changes. > >>> > >>> v5: > >>> * Apply OA restriction from make_rpcs directly. > >>> > >>> v6: > >>> * Rebase for context image setup changes. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 5 +++++ > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++---------- > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h | 3 +++ > >>> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c > >>> index ccb20230df2c..dd65b72bddd4 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c > >>> @@ -1677,6 +1677,11 @@ static void gen8_update_reg_state_unlocked(struct i915_gem_context *ctx, > >>> > >>> CTX_REG(reg_state, state_offset, flex_regs[i], value); > >>> } > >>> + > >>> + CTX_REG(reg_state, CTX_R_PWR_CLK_STATE, GEN8_R_PWR_CLK_STATE, > >>> + gen8_make_rpcs(dev_priv, > >>> + &to_intel_context(ctx, > >>> + dev_priv->engine[RCS])->sseu)); > >> > >> I think there is one issue I missed on the previous iterations of this > >> patch. > >> > >> This gen8_update_reg_state_unlocked() is called when the GPU is parked > >> on the kernel context. > >> > >> It's supposed to update all contexts, but I think we might not be able > >> to update the kernel context image while the GPU is using it. > > The kernel context is only ever taken in extremis (you are either > > parking or stalling userspace) so I don't care. > > > The patch exposing the RPCS configuration to userspace will make use of > the kernel context while OA/perf is enabled. Even if it reprograms the > locked value that will break the power configuration stability on Gen11 > (because the locked configuration will be different from the kernel > context configuration). Sure, but as you point out that's only on changing configuration. What's missing in the patch is that we only bail early if the new sseu matches the ce->sseu, but that doesn't necessarily match whats in the context due to OA. (Or maybe I missed the conversion to rpcs value and checking.) -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
