Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-09-05 14:36:13) > On Tue, 04 Sep 2018 23:57:33 +0200, Chris Wilson > <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Attach our device_info to the our i915 private on creation so that it is > > always available for inspection. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > @@ -1426,7 +1437,6 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct pci_dev *pdev, const > > struct pci_device_id *ent) > > out_fini: > > i915_load_error(dev_priv, "Device initialization failed (%d)\n", ret); > > drm_dev_fini(&dev_priv->drm); > > -out_free: > > kfree(dev_priv); > > pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); > > I think you want drm_dev_fini, kfree and pci_set_drvdata to be moved to > > void i915_driver_destroy(i915) { ... } > > to keep symmetry with just added _create_ function. Sounds reasonable. i915_driver_release becomes cleanup_early; driver_destroy. Naming there feels a little wonky. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx