Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2018-08-21 08:58:26)
> Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Since we no longer maintain our read position in the CSB pointers
> > register, it always returns 0 and not where we last read up to. As a
> > result the CSB probing in the state dumper starts from 0, either missing
> > entries or showing stale one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> > index 8628567d8f6e..49b580c188eb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> > @@ -1345,20 +1345,20 @@ static void intel_engine_print_registers(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> >
> > if (HAS_EXECLISTS(dev_priv)) {
> > const u32 *hws = &engine->status_page.page_addr[I915_HWS_CSB_BUF0_INDEX];
> > - u32 ptr, read, write;
> > unsigned int idx;
> > + u8 read, write;
> >
> > drm_printf(m, "\tExeclist status: 0x%08x %08x\n",
> > I915_READ(RING_EXECLIST_STATUS_LO(engine)),
> > I915_READ(RING_EXECLIST_STATUS_HI(engine)));
> >
> > - ptr = I915_READ(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_PTR(engine));
> > - read = GEN8_CSB_READ_PTR(ptr);
> > - write = GEN8_CSB_WRITE_PTR(ptr);
> > - drm_printf(m, "\tExeclist CSB read %d [%d cached], write %d [%d from hws], tasklet queued? %s (%s)\n",
> > - read, execlists->csb_head,
> > - write,
> > - intel_read_status_page(engine, intel_hws_csb_write_index(engine->i915)),
> > + read = execlists->csb_head;
> > + write = intel_read_status_page(engine,
> > + intel_hws_csb_write_index(dev_priv));
> > +
> > + drm_printf(m, "\tExeclist CSB read %d, write %d [mmio:%d], tasklet queued? %s (%s)\n",
> > + read, write,
>
> In here I was thinking that we want to keep the write as 32bit so it
> would show weirdness in here with %d. But the odds of that to happen
> with only in this status page entry...
Hmm, it was u8 for automatically truncating execlists->csb_write...
Oh, this should have been write = READ_ONCE(*execlists->csb_write);
Mind if I make that change?
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
