I can't find a reason why we would want to call is_enabled(), which does a register read, instead of just relying on our tracking with hw_enabled. Let's try to trust our hardware sync. Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> Requested-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c index f38a049861e6..76bb2e06fef1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c @@ -670,9 +670,8 @@ static void assert_can_enable_dc5(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { struct i915_power_well *pg2 = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, SKL_DISP_PW_2); - bool pg2_enabled = pg2->desc->ops->is_enabled(dev_priv, pg2); - WARN_ONCE(pg2_enabled, "PG2 not disabled to enable DC5.\n"); + WARN_ONCE(pg2->hw_enabled, "PG2 not disabled to enable DC5.\n"); WARN_ONCE((I915_READ(DC_STATE_EN) & DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5), "DC5 already programmed to be enabled.\n"); -- 2.14.4 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx