On 10/08/18 04:01, Chris Wilson wrote:
Normally we wait on the last request, but that overlooks any difficulties in waiting on a request while the next is being qeued.
/s/qeued/queued
Check those. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- tests/gem_sync.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/gem_sync.c b/tests/gem_sync.c index c697220ad..fb209977d 100644 --- a/tests/gem_sync.c +++ b/tests/gem_sync.c @@ -294,6 +294,74 @@ wakeup_ring(int fd, unsigned ring, int timeout, int wlen) igt_assert_eq(intel_detect_and_clear_missed_interrupts(fd), 0); }
+ intel_detect_and_clear_missed_interrupts(fd); + igt_fork(child, num_engines) { + double start, end, elapsed; + unsigned long cycles; + igt_spin_t *spin[2]; + uint32_t cmd; + + spin[0] = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, + .engine = ring, + .flags = IGT_SPIN_FAST); + cmd = *spin[0]->batch; + + spin[1] = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, + .engine = ring, + .flags = IGT_SPIN_FAST); + igt_assert(*spin[1]->batch == cmd); + + start = gettime(); + end = start + timeout; + cycles = 0; + do { + for (int loop = 0; loop < 1024; loop++) { + igt_spin_t *s = spin[loop & 1]; + + igt_spin_batch_end(s); + gem_sync(fd, s->handle);
How does the test fail if the sync goes wrong? Hang detector on the queued batch?
Antonio
+ + *s->batch = cmd; + gem_execbuf(fd, &s->execbuf); + } + cycles += 1024; + } while ((elapsed = gettime()) < end); + igt_spin_batch_free(fd, spin[1]); + igt_spin_batch_free(fd, spin[0]); + + igt_info("%s%sompleted %ld cycles: %.3f us\n", + names[child % num_engines] ?: "", + names[child % num_engines] ? " c" : "C", + cycles, (elapsed - start)*1e6/cycles); + } + igt_waitchildren_timeout(2*timeout, NULL); + igt_assert_eq(intel_detect_and_clear_missed_interrupts(fd), 0); +} +
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx