Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Still can't grasp all details.
> There is state that we read without taking ct->ct_general.use ref
> first, namely ct->state and what's used by nf_ct_key_equal.
> So let's say the entry we want to find is in the list, but
> ____nf_conntrack_find finds a wrong entry earlier because all state it
> looks at is random garbage, so it returns the wrong entry to
> __nf_conntrack_find_get.
If an entry can be found, it can't be random garbage.
We never link entries into global table until state has been set up.
> Now (nf_ct_is_dying(ct) || !atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use))
> check in __nf_conntrack_find_get passes, and it returns NULL to the
> caller (which means entry is not present).
So entry is going away or marked as dead which for us is same as
'not present', we need to allocate a new entry.
> While in reality the entry
> is present, but we were just looking at the wrong one.
We never add tuples that are identical to the global table.
If N cores receive identical packets at same time with no prior state, all
will allocate a new conntrack, but we notice this when we try to insert the
nf_conn entries into the table.
Only one will succeed, other cpus have to cope with this.
(worst case: all raced packets are dropped along with their conntrack
object).
For lookup, we have following scenarios:
1. It doesn't exist -> new allocation needed
2. It exists, not dead, has nonzero refount -> use it
3. It exists, but marked as dying -> new allocation needed
4. It exists but has 0 reference count -> new allocation needed
5. It exists, we get reference, but 2nd nf_ct_key_equal check
fails. We saw a matching 'old incarnation' that just got
re-used on other core. -> retry lookup
> Also I am not sure about order of checks in (nf_ct_is_dying(ct) ||
> !atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use)), because checking state
> before taking the ref is only a best-effort hint, so it can actually
> be a dying entry when we take a ref.
Yes, it can also become a dying entry after we took the reference.
> So shouldn't it read something like the following?
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> begin:
> h = ____nf_conntrack_find(net, zone, tuple, hash);
> if (h) {
> ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
> if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use))
> goto begin;
> if (unlikely(nf_ct_is_dying(ct)) ||
> unlikely(!nf_ct_key_equal(h, tuple, zone, net))) {
> nf_ct_put(ct);
It would be ok to make this change, but dying bit can be set
at any time e.g. because userspace tells kernel to flush the conntrack table.
So refcount is always > 0 when the DYING bit is set.
I don't see why it would be a problem.
nf_conn struct will stay valid until all cpus have dropped references.
The check in lookup function only serves to hide the known-to-go-away entry.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
