On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 10:51 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Patchwork (2018-07-27 10:35:57) > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: series starting with [v6,1/6] drm/i915/guc: Avoid wasting > > memory on incorrect GuC pin bias > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/47328/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4559 -> Patchwork_9788 = > > > > == Summary - FAILURE == > > > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9788 absolutely > > need to be > > verified manually. > > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the > > changes > > introduced in Patchwork_9788, please notify your bug team to > > allow them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false > > positives in CI. > > > > External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/47 > > 328/revisions/1/mbox/ > > > > == Possible new issues == > > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > > Patchwork_9788: > > > > === IGT changes === > > > > ==== Possible regressions ==== > > > > igt@drv_selftest@live_contexts: > > {fi-skl-iommu}: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL > > Ok, just guc related explosions. Are you happy that these are the > usual > explosions? They do look like the usual fallout to me. > -Chris The series does not cause them, enabling the GuC does. We're not happy that this happens, but it's unrelated to the assert failure, and thus something to be fixed later on. - Jakub
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
