On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 11:32 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
> From: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> PSR2 is supported from skl+.
> So Limiting it to skl+.
We restrict PSR2 to gen9+ in intel_psr_init_dpcd(), avoids a few extra
dpcd reads by checking early.
>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 4bd5768..cbbdfd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
> I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val);
> }
>
> -static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +static void skl_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
Yeah, skl_ is appropriate here.
We should also change the function names to hsw_psr1_activate() and
skl_psr2_activate(), it has been annoying me that the activate
functions aren't named in the same fashion as psr_{enable, invalidate,
flush, disable}
> {
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port =
> dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
> @@ -516,7 +516,9 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
> }
>
> crtc_state->has_psr = true;
> - crtc_state->has_psr2 = intel_psr2_config_valid(intel_dp,
> crtc_state);
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
> + crtc_state->has_psr2 =
> intel_psr2_config_valid(intel_dp,
> + crtc_
> state);
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling PSR%s\n", crtc_state->has_psr2 ? "2"
> : "");
> }
>
> @@ -534,7 +536,7 @@ static void intel_psr_activate(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
>
> /* psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive.*/
> if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled)
> - hsw_activate_psr2(intel_dp);
> + skl_activate_psr2(intel_dp);
> else
> hsw_activate_psr1(intel_dp);
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
