Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-07-19 12:42:06) > > On 19/07/2018 09:33, Patchwork wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: drm/i915/execlists: Move the assertion we have the rpm wakeref down > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/46837/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4507 -> Patchwork_9713 = > > > > == Summary - FAILURE == > > > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9713 absolutely need to be > > verified manually. > > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > > introduced in Patchwork_9713, please notify your bug team to allow them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/46837/revisions/1/mbox/ > > > > == Possible new issues == > > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_9713: > > > > === IGT changes === > > > > ==== Possible regressions ==== > > > > igt@drv_selftest@live_evict: > > fi-cnl-psr: NOTRUN -> DMESG-WARN +12 > > > > igt@drv_selftest@live_workarounds: > > {fi-cfl-8109u}: NOTRUN -> DMESG-FAIL > > fi-cnl-psr: NOTRUN -> DMESG-FAIL > > How come these failure are not in, copy & paste from end of email: Postulating it's because fi-cnl-psr spontaneously reappeared and wasn't in the baseline. Fwiw, it's all [drm:intel_print_wm_latency [i915]] ERROR Gen9 Plane WM1 latency not provided above and beyond the expected (reset recovery fails). -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
