On 7/13/2018 1:41 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-07-13 21:35:28)
Inside intel_engine_is_idle(), we flush the tasklet to ensure that is
being run in a timely fashion (ksoftirqd has taught us to expect the
worst). However, if we are in the middle of reset, the HW may not yet be
ready to execute the submission tasklet and so we must respect the
disable flag.
Fixes: dd0cf235d81f ("drm/i915: Speed up idle detection by kicking the tasklets")
Testcase: igt/drv_selftest/live_hangcheck
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
index 220050107c48..fccb95ea1315 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
@@ -989,16 +989,17 @@ bool intel_engine_is_idle(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
/* Waiting to drain ELSP? */
if (READ_ONCE(engine->execlists.active)) {
- struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists = &engine->execlists;
+ struct tasklet_struct *t = &engine->execlists.tasklet;
local_bh_disable();
- if (tasklet_trylock(&execlists->tasklet)) {
- execlists->tasklet.func(execlists->tasklet.data);
- tasklet_unlock(&execlists->tasklet);
+ if (tasklet_trylock(t)) {
+ if (__tasklet_is_enabled(t))
I should leave a clue here. I don't think calling it reset_in_progress()
ties in well with the pure tasklet nature here, so
/* must wait if a GPU reset is in progress */
Yes, reset_in_progress doesn't match, the comment is perfectly clear.
Thanks
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx