On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:51:08 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > But I still have the situation that a bunch of maintainers acked this > and Andrew Morton defacto nacked it, which I guess means I'll keep the > macro in drm? The common way to go about this seems to be to just push > the patch series with the ack in some pull request to Linus and ignore > the people who raised questions, but not really my thing. Heh. But, am I wrong? Code which uses regular kernel style doesn't have these issues. We shouldn't be enabling irregular style - we should be making such sites more regular. The fact that the compiler generates a nice warning in some cases simply helps us with that. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
